← PISA 2025 dashboard

OECD PISA 2025 · data story

Only five systems improved reading. All remain below the OECD average.

From 2018 to 2025, significant reading declines reached three out of four education systems with comparable results. Five improved, and all five remained significantly below the OECD average.

Results released 8 September 2026 · estimates describe successive samples of 15-year-olds

The broad pattern is clear: 56 of 74 systems had a statistically significant reading decline. Five improved, yet none had reached the OECD average.

The reading decline is bigger than a handful of country setbacks. Between 2018 and 2025, scores fell significantly in 56 of 74 education systems with comparable data.

Only five systems improved. Each still performed significantly below the OECD average. The exceptions matter, and they did not reverse the wider picture.

56 / 74systems with a significant reading decline
5systems improved, all below the OECD average
−25OECD average reading points, 2018–2025

Three quarters of comparable systems lost ground

The OECD compared mean reading scores over seven years and tested whether each change was statistically significant. The remaining 13 systems showed no statistically significant change. That count is the residual after subtracting the 56 declines and five improvements from 74.

Significant reading declines far outnumbered improvements

Education systems with comparable PISA reading results · 2018–2025 · count

The OECD identifies 56 significant declines and five improvements among 74 systems. The remaining 13 are calculated from those published counts and had no significant change. Systems and economies are counted equally here.

The average fall continued after 2022

Across 35 OECD countries with comparable data, mean reading performance fell 11 points from 2018 to 2022, then another 14 by 2025. The second drop was larger. PISA describes a seven-year slide across successive groups of 15-year-olds, not a loss measured in the same students.

OECD reading scores fell in both periods

Mean reading score · 35 OECD countries with comparable data · PISA points

Rounded scores come from the OECD comparable-system series. The OECD reports changes of −11 points in 2018–2022 and −14 in 2022–2025; rounded displayed scores may not subtract exactly.

Progress still has distance to cover

The five systems that improved had a real gain compared with their own earlier results. Each nevertheless remained significantly below the OECD mean in 2025. Improvement and being at the OECD average measure different things.

For education leaders, the next question is what sustained improvement looks like: gains that continue across cycles and reach the reading skills students need to evaluate information, compare sources and explain what they have read. PISA identifies the trend; it cannot isolate one cause behind it.

The takeaway: This is a broad reading problem with a small set of improving exceptions. Those exceptions show that upward movement is possible, while their remaining distance from the OECD average shows how much ground is left.

Compare recent score changes across systems →